Categories
Articles

Does Your Association Assume Too Much?

Taking on Additional Maintenance Obligations

The exterior lights outside of each unit in the Passé Pointe Townhome community were past their prime. In connection with giving the community a “face lift,” the Passé Pointe Townhome Association wanted to update the exterior light fixtures to something more modern. The board of directors had even found a supplier and a contractor to install the new lights at a bargain price. In reviewing their community’s declaration of restrictive covenants, however, it became clear that the owners, not the association, had the obligation and, thereby, the authority to maintain, repair and replace the exterior lights. The association wanted to take on replacement of the lights, but at what cost?

The maintenance obligation of a homeowners association or condominium association is usually set forth in the community’s governing documents. Generally, community associations are obligated to maintain the common areas, but there may also be other areas, not owned or otherwise managed by the association, that the association is expressly obligated to maintain. Sometimes, the obligation to maintain a particular portion of property or the improvements thereon is not clearly stated in the governing documents, regardless of the need to perform such maintenance. An association may want to assume the obligation to maintain certain property or improvements, for example, if the need to perform maintenance on certain property or improvements is recognized but is not addressed in the governing documents, if the board of directors of the association determines that having certain maintenance performed in a uniform manner throughout the community is in the best interests of the association, or if the association historically has maintained a particular property. There may be obvious benefits derived from an association assuming additional maintenance: on-going preservation of community facilities, uniformity of maintenance and aesthetics, and economies of scale. These or other benefits may outweigh any risks associated with the association performing assumed maintenance. However, before an association assumes additional maintenance obligations, the board of directors should be aware of the implications of doing so.

First, the board members should determine whether their association has authority to assume maintenance for items not specifically contemplated in the community’s governing documents. The governing documents of some community associations expressly authorize the association to assume maintenance obligations in addition to those specifically set forth in the governing documents. If an association has express authority to assume additional maintenance obligations, the board should make a determination as to whether assuming such obligation is in the best interests of the association and its members. If the association’s authority to perform such maintenance is not clear in the governing documents, the association’s decision to perform such additional maintenance may be challenged by a discontented homeowner. For example, the individual board members may be exposed to potential liability for misappropriation of association funds and/or breach of fiduciary duty. Similarly, if performance of the maintenance is found to be unauthorized, the Association’s common expense assessments imposed on homeowners to recover the costs of such maintenance may be challenged as illegal and improper.

In assuming a maintenance obligation, the association may create an on-going obligation to perform such maintenance. For example, this may occur if the association’s history of performing such maintenance is found to create an implicit agreement to perform such maintenance. Or, if the maintenance performed by or on behalf of an association proves to be defective, the association would likely be held responsible for performing remedial repairs and may be held liable for ancillary damage such defective work may have caused. If, for instance, the Passé Pointe Townhome Association went forward and replaced all of the exterior lights, it may be found responsible for any on-going maintenance or repair needed for such lights. Additionally, if the installation were done improperly and, for example, caused water to leak into the wall behind the light, the association may be responsible for any damage caused.

The board may determine that the benefits associated with the association performing additional maintenance outweigh any potential risks. While it is rarely advisable for a board of directors to act in contravention of the community’s governing documents, the board may have a compelling reason for doing so. In making a decision to take on a greater maintenance obligation than the association is legally obligated to, a board of directors should examine its decision and should record its reasoning in well documented minutes. The board should also consider alternative means of meeting the association’s end goal without having to take on a new maintenance obligation. In the Passé Pointe Townhome community, for example, the board decided to adopt a rule regarding the type of replacement lighting that may be installed in the community. The association also made an arrangement with a contractor to offer the lights to owners at a reduced bulk-price as incentive for the owners to have the lights replaced.

Whenever a community association would like to take on additional maintenance, a unique set of circumstances is presented. The community’s governing documents and the prior maintenance history of the community each may affect the potential benefits and risks to the association and the board members if the association assumes maintenance in a given situation. Members of the board of directors should become informed as to the association’s actual legal obligations with respect to performing maintenance on various properties or improvements, the implications to the association if it assumes additional maintenance, and any alternative options the association may have to assuming such maintenance. The association’s legal counsel may be helpful in performing such an assessment. By understanding some of these issues up front, the board will be in a better position to fulfill its duties and protect the association’s best interests.

Categories
Articles

Leaf Those Trees Alone!

All but one of the homeowners bought their houses in the Leafy Green subdivision because they loved the way the developer had left the back yards wooded.  Squirrels scampered from tree to tree, birds made their homes in high nests, and in the summer it seemed cool.  Imagine the human residents’ surprise, then,  when they got home from work one day and saw that one of their neighbors had clear cut the trees to the property line.  The angry calls to the members of the Board of Directors of the Leafy Green Homeowners Association, Inc. began immediately.  While there is no way to replace an old growth forest overnight, the Board knew that several remedies were available and pursued them at once.

Governmental Regulations

There is no Georgia state statute regulating the removal of trees generally.  HB 557 (Burkhalter’s Tree Bill) was recently passed in the Georgia House of Representatives, but was not passed by the Senate.  Many metropolitan Atlanta counties and some incorporated municipalities, however, have tree ordinances which vary in their specifics but generally are intended to do the following:  1) Protect existing and certain designated “specimen” trees; 2) Establish tree save areas in development areas; 3)  Require planting of shade trees in parking lots and other areas as appropriate; 4) Protect existing trees from damage during construction; 5) Require replanting where trees have been cut down; 6) Require that trees along public right of ways be pruned in a healthy and attractive manner; and 7) Set goals of no net loss of trees in the jurisdiction.  These ordinances are enforced by the County or the City.  If you see a violation in your City or County you (or the Board) should contact the City or County arborist or code enforcement officer who may be able to help you even if there is not a local ordinance in effect.  Trees Atlanta, an organization whose mission is to protect, beautify, and preserve our metropolitan environment by planting and conserving trees, has compiled the following list of government contacts:

COUNTYCONTACTTELEPHONE
ClaytonMike Alexander770-477-3678
CobbLes Brewer770-528-2124
CherokeeChristine White770-479-0449
CowetaCoweta County has no ordinance
DeKalbTom Clairborne404-371-4913
FultonGene Calloway404-730-7531
GwinnettWayne Ledford770-822-7652
HenryDale Hall770-954-2457
CITYCONTACTTELEPHONE
AlpharettaJennifer Hite678-297-6200
AtlantaFrank Mobley404-330-6874
ChambleeWill Wiggins770-986-5024
ClarkstonBill Adams404-296-6489
College ParkDon Shannon404-669-3762
ConyersNone
DecaturHugh Saxon404-370-4104
DuluthKen Seddarth770-476-1790
East PointTahirah Elliot404-209-5183
FayettevilleMaurice Ungaro770-460-4255
LithoniaKaren Smith770-482-8136
MariettaRusty Roth770-794-5670
NewnanMichael Furbush770-352-2682
NorcrossJohn Lawler770-448-4935
Pine LakeMavis Crossley404-292-4250
RoswellKurt Greenhaw770-641-3780
SmyrnaRobin Broil770-319-5387
SnellvilleJeff Timler770-985-3514
Stone MountainNone

Copies of many of the local ordinances are available on the internet, for example, Fulton County is at www.fultonecd.org.

Government entities have the power to issue citations, fine and/or require replanting.  The penalties for violating tree ordinances can be severe.  In Fulton County any person violating any of the provisions of the tree ordinance shall be liable for a fine of up to $1,000.00 per violation per day.  Each calendar day a violation continues to exist is considered a separate offense.  There is no maximum fine.  Enlisting the help of your local governmental entity in cases of unapproved tree cutting is often an efficient and cost-effective method of ensuring compliance and may give almost immediate results.  If you are unsuccessful in reaching, or getting assistance from the ordinance enforcement officers, call your county commissioner or other elected representative.

Restrictive Covenants

In some communities, such as the City of Decatur, the tree ordinance does not apply to trees on residential properties.  Even if your community government is not able to assist you, however, your neighborhood may have a remedy.  Most Declarations of Protective Covenants, Conditions, Restrictions and Easements contain provisions, often in the article relating to use restrictions, that prohibit removal of trees of a certain size and trees of certain species regardless of size.  In addition to violating local ordinances then, a wholesale cutting of trees would constitute a violation of the neighborhood’s covenants as well.  The remedies available to the association for violating these provisions generally includes fining and/or seeking equitable relief.  In the case of a homeowner who clear cuts his property, an association would have to carefully follow the procedures set forth in the Declaration and By-Laws of the Association before imposing fines and filing liens.  The Association may well want to file suit quickly to collect the fines and, maybe more importantly, to ask the Court for a mandatory injunction to order the homeowner to replant the trees.

It is important that a representative from the Association document the condition of the property as soon as possible after the incident by taking photographs and videotapes.  It is imperative that the Association determine the number of and species of trees cut.  This should be done immediately before the tree removal company has the opportunity to remove the trees and grind the stumps, making it much more difficult to ascertain damages.

Preventive Measures

The best defense is always a good offense.  Be sure that your association includes articles in its newsletter about the importance of obtaining approval before cutting any trees.  Put an item on the association’s web page.  Remind everyone at the annual meeting to review the use restrictions in the Declaration, including the provision about trees.  Trees Atlanta says it best:  “It’s easy to replace a hundred year old tree.  Plant a new one, then wait a hundred years.”